sön 2009-07-19 klockan 16:06 +0800 skrev Adrian Chadd:
> I've fixed a potentially risky situation in Lusca relating to the
> initialisation of the storeIOState cbdata type. Each storedir has a
> different idea of how the allocation should be free()'ed.
Risky in what sense?
All your patch does is layering yet another free callback ontop of the
cbdata free callback which was already fs specific. How does that
improve things or make them less risky?
Regards
Henrik
Received on Mon Jul 20 2009 - 01:35:16 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jul 20 2009 - 12:00:05 MDT