mån 2009-07-13 klockan 14:53 +1200 skrev Amos Jeffries:
> Lets kick the vote off now then....
+1 on both I suppose, assuming the code has been reasonably tested
already and can easily be backported to 3.1. But ultimately it's your
call.
On the down side 3.1 is already quite delayed as it is...
Another alternative is to plan for a short-term 3.2 feature release
between 3.1 and 3.2 with reasonable feature backports where possible..
possibly even dropping some code from current 3.1 if that would help 3.1
getting out sooner. But this probably costs even more developer time.
Regards
Henrik
Received on Mon Jul 13 2009 - 11:04:59 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Jul 15 2009 - 12:00:05 MDT